Why Judge Barrett Doesn’t Know Whether She Would Overturn Precedent

Nominees to the Supreme Court have plenty of good reasons not to opine on legal issues that could come before the Court in the future.

Share this story

Judge Amy Coney Barrett attends a meeting with Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) on Capitol Hill, October 1, 2020.

Erin Scott/Pool/via Reuters

During then-Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee in July 1993, she told the Committee why she could not “preview” her views on “questions” that might come before the Court:

Since then, “no previews, no forecasts, no hints” has been known as “the Ginsburg Rule.” Judge Amy Coney Barrett will likely follow it in her own confirmation hearings, as has virtually every nominee since Ginsburg, including John Roberts, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. Some senators will likely still press Barrett on her views on past decisions, precedent, and other issues, of course.

Clarke D. Forsythe

About the Author

Clarke D. Forsythe

Clarke D. Forsythe is senior counsel at Americans United for Life. He is the author of Abuse of Discretion: The Inside Story of Roe v. Wade and, with Alexandra DeSanctis Marr, Pushing Roe v. Wade over the Brink.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement