Why Should Roald Dahl’s Grandchildren Tell Us What We’re Allowed to Read?

If we are worried about further edits of the sort Dahl has suffered, we ought to reduce copyright after an author’s death.

Share this story

Left: Roald Dahl. Right: A child reads Roald Dahl’s The Giant Peach as part of the ‘Everybody Wins!’ program at the Marie Reed Community Center in Washington, D.C., January 11, 2010.

Wikimedia Commons, Astrid Riecken/The Washington Post via Getty Images

Egregious though it is that Roald Dahl’s books have been edited to make them “morally acceptable,” we should not be too concerned about the editing itself. People have always interfered with literature. Charles C. W. Cooke recently asked whether the sensitivity editors will come for Shakespeare next — well, they already have! Shakespeare has been mangled out of all recognition several times. There is one clear difference, though, between Shakespeare and Dahl. Anyone can edit Shakespeare, whereas only Dahl’s estate can edit him.

Copyright — not the sentimental urge to “improve” a book — is the real villain. Once Dahl goes out of copyright, anyone will be able to do whatever they want to his work. His stories won’t just have a few words changed: Plots will be altered, characters added and removed, adaptations made, scary stuff turned to cheery stuff. But once the original is out of copyright, these would become additions, not replacements.

HO

About the Author

Henry Oliver

Henry Oliver writes the literary Substack the Common Reader. He is currently working on a book about late bloomers.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement