Why Southern Baptists Are Wary of IVF

It’s time to clear up some misconceptions about the position that the Southern Baptist Convention has taken against in vitro fertilization.

Share this story

Attendants sing during the Southern Baptist Convention at the Indiana Convention Center in Indianapolis, Ind., June 11, 2024.

Kelly Wilkinson/IndyStar/USA Today Network via Reuters

On June 12, messengers from the nation’s largest Protestant denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, approved a resolution on in vitro fertilization. Despite the breathless headlines and cable-media chyrons describing this action as a “ban on IVF” or motivated by nefarious political concerns, the measure merely calls for ethical reflection on reproductive technologies, even as it expresses deep moral concern about IVF in particular. In part, it reads:

The consideration of the resolution included sustained debate on the floor, from both sides of the IVF debate, but an overwhelming majority eventually voted to approve. It’s important to note that a resolution is not binding but reflects the will of the messengers convened at that particular convention. Still, these pronouncements often elicit conversation both within the denomination and without.

DD

About the Author

Daniel Darling

Daniel Darling is the director of the Land Center for Cultural Engagement at Southwestern Seminary and is the author of several books including his latest, In Defense of Christian Patriotism.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement