State Courts Should Not Set National Energy Policy

The Framers of our Constitution never intended for officials in Boulder, Colo., or any city, to set the energy and climate policy for the entire nation. The Supreme Court may have a chance to bolster the principle of federal supremacy over truly nationwide problems in a case pending for review, Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder.

Boulder’s lawsuit uses tort law — a body of state-made law that addresses accidents and noncriminal harms — to reshape national energy policy. After failing to push sweeping Green New Deal–style mandates through Congress, climate activists have turned their efforts toward the judicial system. Dozens of states and cities have filed copycat lawsuits that incredibly claim that energy companies have sold their product to unwitting consumers without disclosing the harms of climate change. These flimsy claims tempt judges into indulging their personal political preferences and imposing restrictions on energy that the political system has already rejected. This is not the proper use of the courts, but an effort to use the judiciary to sidestep public debate and democratic checks and balances.

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).

Featured Tags

The Framers of our Constitution never intended for officials in Boulder, Colo., or any city, to set the energy and climate policy for the entire nation. The Supreme Court may have a chance to bolster the principle of federal supremacy over truly nationwide problems in a case pending for review, Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder.

Boulder’s lawsuit uses tort law — a body of state-made law that addresses accidents and noncriminal harms — to reshape national energy policy. After failing to push sweeping Green New Deal–style mandates through Congress, climate activists have turned their efforts toward the judicial system. Dozens of states and cities have filed copycat lawsuits that incredibly claim that energy companies have sold their product to unwitting consumers without disclosing the harms of climate change. These flimsy claims tempt judges into indulging their personal political preferences and imposing restrictions on energy that the political system has already rejected. This is not the proper use of the courts, but an effort to use the judiciary to sidestep public debate and democratic checks and balances.

About the Author

John Yoo

John Yoo is the Thomas W. Smith Senior Fellow at the Civitas Institute, University of Texas at Austin; Emanuel S. Heller Professor of Law at the University of California at Berkeley; and a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He is a co-author of the just-released two-volume American Constitutional Law (Routledge, 2026).