Why Trump’s Manhattan Case Is Headed for a Four-Year Freeze

Two months before inauguration, the president-elect likely prefers a suspension over an appeal.

Share this story

Former president Donald Trump comments to members of the media after being found guilty on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City, May 30, 2024.

Seth Wenig/Pool via Reuters

In yesterday’s column, I sketched out why I believe President-elect Trump’s Manhattan prosecution by District Attorney Alvin Bragg is going to be suspended for four years — i.e., until the end of Trump’s presidency, in January 2029. This seems like a near certainty to me now, having looked at competing proposals for next steps, the first in yesterday’s letter from DA Bragg to Judge Juan Merchan and the second in a letter that the president-elect’s lawyers sent Judge Merchan today. (I have not yet seen the letter, but there is a thorough report on it by Fox News’s Brooke Singman.)

Bottom line: Trump is making a new motion to dismiss the case, based in part on immunity principles. I don’t think the motion is legally meritorious. Nevertheless, it would assure that further proceedings before Judge Merchan would be suspended until Trump leaves office, presumably in 2029. That’s because of the schedules the parties have proposed for briefing, coupled with the fact that immunity rulings can be appealed immediately — meaning, once he denies the motion, as he is sure to do, Judge Merchan will not be able to sentence Trump or enter the formal judgment of conviction (the thing that would make Trump a convicted felon) until after Trump’s appeals of the dismissal motion have run their course.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement