With More Scrutiny, the Trump DOJ Indictment of Comey Gets Worse

There is no provable false-statements case against the former FBI director.

Share this story

Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee, June 8, 2017.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters

The Trump Justice Department’s false-statement indictment against former FBI Director James Comey is so ill-conceived that the longer one analyzes it, the worse it gets. Plus, it is incoherently drafted, such that it fails to fulfill an indictment’s constitutional purpose; namely, to put the defendant on notice of what the government alleges he has done to violate the law.

As I observed after the charges were made public, the remaining false-statement charge (as opposed to the one the grand jury rejected) is unclear, to the point that one had to pore over the transcript of Comey’s Senate testimony and consult press reports to decipher the supposedly illegal conduct.

Andrew C. McCarthy

About the Author

Andrew C. McCarthy

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at National Review Institute, an NR contributing editor, and author of Ball of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement