Yes, Armed Civilians Can — and Do — Stop Mass Shootings

Data ignored by the FBI show the importance of defensive gun use in bringing down active shooters.

Share this story

A gun rights supporter carries a pistol during a rally in support of the Michigan Open Carry gun law in Romulus, Mich. in 2014.

Rebecca Cook/Reuters

Two days after last week’s attack on an Oregon elementary school, the Associated Press opened a news story with a familiar claim: “Few mass shootings in the U.S. end like the deadly attack on an Oregon elementary school: with an armed civilian opening fire on the gunman.” NPR also noted “how rarely an armed civilian ends an attack like this.”

Yet since January 2025, the Crime Prevention Research Center (CPRC) has documented 16 defensive gun uses in which police credited armed civilians with stopping what otherwise might have become mass public shootings, as in the attack in Oregon. During that same period, five mass public shootings occurred in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.

JL

About the Author

John R. Lott Jr.

John R. Lott Jr. is the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center. He served as the senior adviser for research and statistics in the Office of Justice Programs and the Office of Legal Policy in the U.S. Department of Justice during 2020–21.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement