During tonight’s televised debate between senate candidates Pat Toomey and Joe Sestak, which was largely a contest in which man could be painted as the more extreme, the two digressed briefly when discussing gun rights.

Toomey, seeking to highlight his pro-gun, pro-law enforcement credentials, cited his endorsement from the Pennsylvania Fraternal Order of Police, which Battle ‘10 covered earlier in the race. Sestak countered that he had received support from specific sub-chapters of the Pennsylvania FOP.

But in searching for proof of that support, Battle ‘10 has come up empty:

Try the search for yourself.

If he had received support from law enforcement, wouldn’t he want his supporters to know?

Update: A few readers have e-mailed to point out that Sestak does in fact have two endorsements: one from FOP Loge 112, and another from Lodge 106. They’re listed here.