Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet has an interesting piece in today’s LA Times about the evanescent effect that Supreme Court rulings can often have, if those involved in attaining the victories don’t keep pushing for the changes the decisions are supposed to bring about. He’s certainly right about Brown, which was a victory more symbolic than substantial until Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Share this story

About the Author
Matthew J. Franck is a senior fellow at the Witherspoon Institute, a senior contributing editor of Public Discourse, a lecturer in politics at Princeton University, and professor emeritus of political science at Radford University.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments