Leahy manfully hides behind Justice O’Connor’s robe. In a typical jumble of contradictions, he complains that Harriet Miers’ nomination was withdrawn, but says that Alito must prove that he would be independent of President Bush. Given that Alito, apart from his nomination, has (unlike Miers) no links to the President, what reason is there to think that he is “beholden” to him?
Share this story

About the Author
Ed Whelan holds the Antonin Scalia Chair in Constitutional Studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and is a regular contributor to National Review’s Bench Memos blog.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments