Matt, you may be in favor of more in-depth substantive questioning, but you won’t get more in-depth substantive answers, which has been my response to you before as it is now. Your position is, as they say, “academic.” Having said that, since, as you say, she has no useful record, if she refuses to provide the kind of responses to questions that you (and Schumer) would pose, would you vote against her? I assume the answer is yes, you’d vote against her, if only to compel nominees to begin to answer those kind of questions or risk defeat. In any event, I see no use in going more rounds on this. The fact is the president has disappointed.