On Judge Bataillon’s theory, don’t opponents of same-sex marriage in Massachusetts have a federal case? The Massachusetts court infringed on their “associational political rights,” or whatever he calls this judicial invention, by forcing them to pass a constitutional amendment, rather than persuade the legislature, to see their views prevail.

About the Author
Ramesh Ponnuru is the editor of National Review, a columnist for the Washington Post, and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments