1971—In a unanimous opinion in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe, Justice Thurgood Marshall hilariously illustrates the topsy-turvy understanding of the relationship between statutory text and legislative history that dominated the Warren Court and that prevailed for years after. Marshall first observes that the “legislative history of [two statutes] is ambiguous” and only then turns to the statutory text: “Because of this ambiguity [in legislative history], it is clear that we must look primarily to the statutes themselves to find the legislative intent.”
Share this story

About the Author
Ed Whelan holds the Antonin Scalia Chair in Constitutional Studies at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and is a regular contributor to National Review’s Bench Memos blog.
Advertisement
Advertisement




Comments