This is from the testimony of Congressman Curt Weldon at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Wednesday, under questioning by the chairman, Sen. Arlen Specter:

SEN. SPECTER: Congressman Weldon, had this information been called to the attention of the national security adviser?
REP. WELDON: Mr. Chairman, two weeks after 9/11, some of the folks at the Army’s LIWA [Land Information Warfare Command] and involved in Able Danger came into my office and brought me a chart, a chart that had al Qaeda linkages and pan-Islamic terrorist threats — I think was the way the chart was categorized. I took that chart immediately down to the White House and provided it to [then-Deputy National Security Adviser, now National Security Adviser] Stephen Hadley. And I took with me [Congressman] Dan Burton, chairman of the Government Operations Oversight Committee.
SEN. SPECTER: And when was that?
REP. WELDON: That was two weeks after 9/11, so it would have been September the 25th.
And I took it down immediately. As soon as I got it, I said I’ve got to get this down to the White House.
Stephen Hadley’s response to me was where did you get this from, Congressman? I said I got it from the Army’s Information Dominance Center. I said this is the process that’s been used that I’ve been trying to convince the government for three years to put into place, but the CIA has refused to accept. Because up until the establishment of the TTIC — the Terrorist Threat Integration Center — the CIA was not using open source information, which to me was a disaster in itself for our national intelligence estimates.
And so I said to Mr. Hadley — I said this is a process they used to obtain this information. And he said to me — and I remember this quote; it sticks out in my head … that he said I’ve got to show this to the man. And I said the man? He said yes, the president of the United States. So I gave him the chart.
(Sept. 21 T’script. pp. 15-16.) Why after all these weeks, and after all the controversy over whether Weldon and the Able Danger witnesses were credible – about whether, in fact, they had fabricated a tall tale about having an al Qaeda chart, compiled before 9/11, that may have had hijacker Mohamed Atta on it – have we still not heard from National Security Adviser Hadley, or someone at the White House, about whether Hadley agrees with Weldon’s version of events?
It’s not like this is unimportant. And it’s not like Hadley’s memory has faded – at least according to Weldon, who told the committee he’s recently spoken with Hadley about it:
And I can tell you this — I talked to Mr. Hadley three months ago when I briefed him on another issue, and I said, remember that chart that I gave you? And he said, yes, I remember it. Now, I don’t know why [sic] the White House still has it. They probably don’t. It’s been four years. I can tell you, my recollection of that chart is it was very similar to this [demonstration chart used at the senate hearing], but not as comprehensive. This chart includes post-9/11 data, so obviously the chart that I gave him did not have post-9/11 data. But it was significant. It identified the cells — the five key cells they were working on, and to the best of my recollection, identified Mohamed Atta on the chart.
(Id., at p. 18.) Mr. Hadley?