Here’s another:

Ms. Lopez, You requested the opinion of readers on the Pro-Joe/No-Joe issue. I submit this as perhaps the most conservative voter left in the deep blue state of Connecticut. I voted for Lieberman the first time he ran because Lowell Weicker was an abomination. But God, in his infinite wisdom, punished us conservatives for voting for Lieberman. Weicker became governor and completed the destruction of Connecticut’s economy started by Bill O’Neill. Having witnessed God’s terrible wrath, I have voted against Lieberman ever since. Last time, we loyal conservatives even voted for the man who was later convicted of molesting children. Oh yes, it’s a joy to vote here in Connecticut. But seriously, Lieberman has voted against the ban on partial-birth abortion six times. Why are conservatives supporting him? This year I’ll be voting for the Republican candidate who has already admitted to using an alias to gamble at casinos. Because he’s still better than Joe. Joe’s record is consistently liberal. I am completely perplexed by this outpouring of conservative love for Lieberman based on one issue. Does anyone remember the liberal VP candidate from 2000? That was Lieberman. This is Connecticut. To say that Lamont is to the left of Lieberman is to say that Lenin was to the left of Trotsky. OK, but does that make Trotsky a disciple of Adam Smith? Let’s refocus here and talk about the opportunity to get a better Republican candidate and let Lamont and Lieberman split the Democratic vote.