I’m really reluctant to do this because I honestly think a fair reading of what I said shows what my intent was. But a number of readers still insist that I was being unfair to Hugh Hewitt, despite my clarification . And since they think I meant to say something I didn’t mean to say, I might as well try one last time to set the record straight. I do not think, nor was I trying to say, that Hewitt is either dishonest or a hack. And if I gave that impression I apologize. My only point was that even if you happen to think that way about him, that would still mean he’s a far better man than Sid Blumenthal. Perhaps my own state of mind was so obvious to me I couldn’t see how others would read it differently than I intended. Anyway, that’s all I’ve got to say.