Jonah, I’d agree there is something more than a little off about that piece by Bernard-Henri Lévy, but at the same time here and there he does have a point. Specifically, I’ve long thought that the carefully choreographed degradation that accompanies an arraignment (the perp walk, the often clearly unecessary use of handcuffs and so on) is a spectacle of humiliation that fits very uneasily with innocent-until-proved-guilty, and not only symbolically so. The jury needs to be persuaded by what goes on in the court room, not by the theatrics that may precede it.

About the Author
Andrew Stuttaford is the editor of National Review's Capital Matters.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments