From a reader in a fine American city whose name is an anagram of

MINNEAPOSIL:

โ€œDerbโ€“I just read the Corner, and J-Podโ€™s post about you in effect being

Eeyore. I always envisioned you more as Rabbit than Eeyore โ€“ not so much

depressed as just focused on tasks at hand. So I thought to myself, โ€˜well I

guess Iโ€™m Tigger. Or a cross between Pooh and Tigger. And thatโ€™s fine with

me.โ€™ I never thought I would write it. (Our two girls are 5ยฝ and 3ยฝ, giving

me license to be up on all of this.)

โ€œHowever, since youโ€™re into paranoid pessimism, how far in the future do you

think โ€˜Tiggerโ€™ will be allowed as the name of a character for children? Iโ€™m

amazed it hasnโ€™t happened already, but does no one else envision a day when

the ACLU takes the works of AA Milne to task for introducing the name of a

character that sounds โ€˜too closeโ€™ to that of a racial slur?โ€

[Derb here] The awful thing, Sir, is that it doesnโ€™t actually take the ACLU

to suppress things like that. We do it ourselves, with our pathologically

hypertrophied โ€œsensitivity.โ€ PC has seeped so deep into our bones that we

are now self-policing. Like the British journalist in the old rhyme:

No one could ever bribe or twist โ€“

Thank God! โ€” the British journalist;

But seeing what the man will do

Un-bribed, thereโ€™s no good reason to.

I predict that Tigger will be unmentionable in 2-5 years.

(And no snarky comments about various other predictions of mine, please.)