John, Cliff โ€” I too waded into the Lord of the Rings and its conservatism. Indeed, this review , got me invited to do special commentary for the release of the Return of the King DVD. But those selfish, cruel bastards decided my wild, soul-pawning, sycophancy wasnโ€™t worth including in the final cut. Fortunately, Iโ€™m not at all bitter. Anyway, an excerpt:

Now, if you need to go get in line for the movie, you are excused. But Iโ€™d like to say a few more words about Tolkien.
Tolkien was one of the great unheralded conservatives of the 20th century. Oh donโ€™t worry, Iโ€™m not going to try to score ideological points by saying Tolkien opposed nationalized health care or anything like that (though it is hardly insignificant that one of Tolkienโ€™s dearest friends and closest colleagues was C. S. Lewis).
No, Tolkienโ€™s conservatism was deeper than even the deepest dwarf-mine in the hills of the White Mountains. Tolkien despised modernity and disliked technology. He made a concession to the existence of factories, but only because they collected all the machines in one place and kept them hidden from view in out-of-the-way buildings. A widely respected scholar of the English language who could debate in Greek and Latin and speak fluent Gothic, Tolkien was a professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford (he also worked on the โ€œWโ€ section โ€” one of my favorite chapters, far better than the thin gruel to be found in the โ€œLโ€ section โ€” of the Oxford English Dictionary).
A man after my own heart, Tolkien despised the French, but not for their brie-spined capitulation during World War II or any of the usual reasons (though he hated French food). According to his biographer, Humphrey Carpenter, the Norman invasion of England in 1066 โ€œpained him almost as much as if it had happened in his own lifetime.โ€ In a very nice essay in a recent issue of The New Yorker, Anthony Lane points out that Tolkienโ€™s โ€œview of English literature, incidentally, ended more or less where the current view begins; he rarely ventured later than Chaucer, and thought Shakespeare to be pernicious nonsense.โ€
Now, thatโ€™s a conservative!

I should also note that John Miller has written extensively on the subject as well. Thatโ€™s right, weโ€™re Rings geeks around here. Tell me, whoโ€™s surprised?