New York state-senate Republicans decided last night that they would continue to allow Dean Skelos to keep his job as that bodyโ€™s powerful majority leader. Skelos was indicted on Monday on a six-count federal indictment charging him with extortion, conspiring to commit fraud, and soliciting bribes in a corruption scheme also involving his son, Adam.

The โ€œpresumption of innocenceโ€ standard that Skelos was granted is certainly understandable. His GOP predecessor as majority leader, Joseph Bruno, was ultimately cleared last year by a jury after two trials.

But something is clearly wrong with the GOP state senate, a hive of special-interest dealing and ethical lapses. Thomas Libous, the No. 2 ranking Republican in the Senate and Skelosโ€™s deputy, is also under federal indictment in a corruption probe. Along with the Democratic-controlled assembly, the state senate has been complicit in making New York a high-tax, overregulated, job-killing center of stagnation.

A jury will ultimately decide Senator Skelosโ€™s guilt, but the indictment prepared by U.S. attorney Preet Bharara is damning. Skelosโ€™s son was apparently frustrated that he couldnโ€™t openly discuss the various contracts and kickbacks his father had allegedly arranged for him.

Hereโ€™s how Business Insider summed up a conversation Adam Skelos had with his father:

According to the complaint, Adam Skelos was caught in an โ€œintercepted callโ€ telling his father it was unfortunate he couldnโ€™t get any โ€œreal adviceโ€ because โ€œyou canโ€™t talk normally because itโ€™s like fโ€”ing Preet Bharara is listening to every fโ€”ing phone call. Itโ€™s just fโ€“ing frustrating.โ€
To this, Dean Skelos allegedly responded, โ€œIt is.โ€
Adam Skelos seemed to have other potentially questionable ideas for avoiding detection. According to the complaint, the younger Skelos at one point suggested using Appleโ€™s โ€œFaceTimeโ€ video chatting software because it โ€œdoesnโ€™t show up on the phone bill, just the data plan.โ€

Isnโ€™t it time that New York Republicans demand a higher ethical and, yes, principled standard from the men and women they elect to the one part of state government they control?