A reader writes:
At least Dan Rather did actual investigative journalism for over 40 years as opposed to your unfounded “National Enquirer” scurrilous attacks that allegedly pass for journalism. You are not fit to shine his “too big for you to fill” shoes.
Two thoughts:
1) That would be a better argument were it not for the entire premise of Dan’s complaint against CBS – which is that he’s completely innocent of any wrongdoing because he’s merely the empty suit who fronts whatever copy the real reporters stick on the teleprompter.
2) Say what you like about The National Enquirer, but they do plenty of ”investigative journalism”.






Comments