Should a man with a long list of pornographers as clients–and a long, outspoken record of objecting to attempts to regulate the pornography industry in order to prevent child sex abuse–be confirmed as deputy attorney general? For Obama nominee David Ogden, even requiring pornographers to keep records documenting that their subjects are not underage would “burden too heavily and infringe too deeply on the right to produce First Amendment protected material.” Does Obama really want a deputy attorney general so deeply committed to the right to produce porn?