Regarding the JPod/Krikorian spat on U.S. troops in Europe, as a famously moderate bipartisan centrist, I find myself caught in the middle between their two extremes. The U.S. military on the Continent should not โ€œcome homeโ€ for McGovernite or any other reasons: America needs to be out there, engaged in the world.

But hundreds of thousands of U.S. personnel should not be living permanently in Europe, for reasons I go into in America Alone. The problem is nicely encapsulated in a remark by Karl Peter Bruch, the then Interior Minister for Rhineland-Palatinate. When Rummy first mooted reducing the American presence and the Germans started lobbying Washington to change their minds, Herr Bruch said:

We realised that our installations are in grave danger. And then came the question, what can we do to make us more attractive?

โ€œOurโ€ installations? Whoโ€™s this โ€œour,โ€ kemosabe? These bases are built, maintained and staffed by the United States โ€“ and paid for by U.S. taxpayers. Yet Herr Bruch regards them as a permanent feature of the German landscape, like the Black Forest.

As noted here yesterday, the U.S. is not a conventional imperial power. It garrisons not ramshackle colonies but some of the wealthiest nations of the planet. Absolved of the core responsibility of sovereign jurisdictions โ€” defense of the realm โ€“ Europe decayed, almost inevitably, into a kind of semi-non-aligned status, and persuaded itself that it had developed a higher model of nationhood, not realizing that its lavish social programs were, in effect, subsidized by the Pentagon. This has been bad for Europe โ€“ and bad for America, too, in that most of the Democratic Party would like to introduce the European model here, apparently unaware that it depends on a strong America to render it viable.

The Continentals are so insulated from reality they donโ€™t even value the U.S. presence in strategic terms. German politicians speak of U.S. military bases mainly as an economic issue โ€“ all those German supermarkets and German restaurants that depend on American custom. At the risk of igniting old controversies, the Continentals are the defense equivalents of those wealthy S-CHIP families: They would function better as adult nations if they had to accept the responsibilities of adulthood.