So, Teresa has deigned to release exactly two pages of her tax return. Turn to, um, page 10, (the story is, ahem, tucked away below the fold) of the New York Times for details of what is missing:

“Nothing about the trusts that benefit Mrs. Heinz Kerry herself and her three sons was disclosed.”

Why not? These trusts are, wrote the New York Times, “believed to be worth about a billion dollars.” That’s not exactly an immaterial amount when it concerns a possible First Lady, a woman who, we must assume, has some influence on her husband.

No details of her charitable donations were disclosed.

Again, why not? Were some of those donations to causes that might be politically embarrassing, or were they perhaps to organizations that have supported, directly or indirectly, her husband or his campaign?

If these suggestions are unfair, they should be easy enough for Teresa to refute. All it would take is full disclosure of those returns. How about it, Teresa?