I will bet half the farm that the MSM will not spend much time discussing Justice Thomas’s compelling dissent from the medical marijuana decision. And why? Because Scalia was on the other side, and it’s an article of canonical faith that the two always do the same thing…
Thomas’s dissent is part of his continuing primal scream against the use of the Commerce Clause to regulate anything that the Feds want to regulate…and tax anything they want to tax. Whazzup with Scalia, anyway? Why did he fall for this one?





Comments