The Senate should reject the new START treaty. We make our case here:

There is simply no compelling rationale for this treaty, and it places much at risk. If the Obama administration thinks we need fewer warheads, it can cut them. If it thought START verification provisions were essential, it could have sought a one- or two-year extension. Instead, in its desperation for this parchment accomplishment, it has signed a sloppy treaty that we may well regret. If the Senate votes No, we’ll hear public howls of outrage from the Russians. But in private they’ll probably be astonished by our ability to calculate our interests.