Employees at larger companies are getting some eye-opening news in the W-2 statements they are receiving this month listing their 2012 income.

The health overhaul law required employers to add a line reporting the total cost of employer-sponsored health-insurance coverage. โ€œTo some, it will be a surprise, perhaps even a shock,โ€ Robert Pear reports in a New York Times piece, โ€œTo Open Eyes, W-2s List Cost of Providing a Health Plan.โ€

Prof. Nicole Huberfeld, an expert on health law at the University of Kentucky, who received her W-2 form on Monday, said, โ€œMost people who get health insurance from their employers have no idea how much it costs.โ€
โ€œPeople are often shocked when they see the cost, $12,000 to $16,000 a year,โ€ Ms. Huberfeld said. โ€œMany Americans believe this is something they get free. But employers pay lower wages because they provide insurance.โ€
. . . Jay J. Makled, a union steward for the United Automobile Workers at the Ford plant in Dearborn, Mich., described his reaction after seeing that his health coverage cost nearly $16,000 last year: โ€œItโ€™s quite expensive. I was surprised to see how much the company was paying for that benefit.โ€

We have argued for years at the Galen Institute that the generous tax break for job-based health insurance shields employees from knowing the full cost of the benefit they are receiving โ€” and the wages they are giving up to get the expensive health coverage.

Peter R. Orszag, then the director of the Congressional Budget Office, told lawmakers: โ€œThe economic evidence is overwhelming, the theory is overwhelming, that when your firm pays for your health insurance, you actually pay through reduced take-home pay. The firm is not giving that to you for free.โ€

The number is being disclosed on a tax form even though health benefits are not counted as taxable income โ€” yet.

โ€œHealth coverage is a big piece of peopleโ€™s income and a large part of the social welfare budget,โ€ said C. Eugene Steuerle, a tax economist at the Urban Institute. โ€œBut the benefits are not taxable, and most of the spending is hidden, so we donโ€™t consider the trade-offs. If we want to get control of health care costs, people have to be aware of them.โ€

That is the goal of the disclosure requirement, which was proposed by a bipartisan group of senators: two Republicans, Charles E. Grassley of Iowa and Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming, and two Democrats, Max Baucus of Montana and Ron Wyden of Oregon.

This is just a preview of the sticker shock that is coming when Obamacareโ€™s mandated benefits and regulatory distortions kick in.

An employee of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. whose health coverage was listed as costing more than $20,000 said: โ€œThat knocks my socks off. When I saw the number, my eyes popped out. I appreciate my employer all the more.โ€

The Cadillac Tax begins in 2018, adding a 40 percent excise tax to the highest-cost health insurance.

If you didnโ€™t see the line on your tax form, it may be because employers are exempt from the reporting obligation if they are required to file fewer than 250 W-2 forms.

The law calls for the report to have been included in W-2s last year, but Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius declared employers would have a one-year reprieve.