From a reader re last night’s post about guns:
Jonah –
In the case of guns, there is still a natural way of reconciling (limited) Constitutional protection with the possibility that empirical evidence might show that, crudely put, “guns are bad for you.” The Federal government can’t outlaw gun ownership, but states can. Would that this split and flexible system were still maintained for at least the more extravagant examples of free expression.






Comments