In todayโ€™s WashPost, columnist Tina Brown bites on the Dan Rather spin that he was just an empty suit on the Bush-TexANG fiasco, and ends by claiming โ€œThe old Canadian press baron Lord Northcliffeโ€™s definition of news is still the only one that counts: โ€˜News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising.โ€™โ€

What a bad slogan โ€” it doesnโ€™t seem to care whether the news is true or not, which is the whole problem with Rather. It could be his slogan. But itโ€™s odd coming out of Tina, whose snake-oil advertising for the sexiness and loving marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton was too ridiculous for words. Stroll down memory lane here.