My notion of what a compromise might look like is based on conversations with House members. I have spoken to many Republicans who strongly support the House enforcement-only immigration bill, are adamantly opposed to a “path to citizenship” for illegals, but also say that they see a need (thanks to employers in their districts) for a guest worker program. They will likely see the Senate bill ia an unfixable 795 page mess. Many of them might be open to adding some sort of a guest worker program to the enforcement bill they think is right on the merits and politically saleable, with clear enforcement benchmarks before it goes into effect. They also appear to agree with NRO-niks who think a bad bill (weak on enforcement/ legalizing illegals) is worse than no bill.