On paper, she makes the most sense for Obama. She has some experience (not as green as, say, a Kaine); she can speak to economic concerns; heaven knows, she’s comfortable with the role of an attack dog; she’s a woman; and she obviously appeals to Hillary voters (at least the hardened feminists among them). Yes, she harkens to the past, but an Obama-Hillary ticket would be so historic it would probably only add to the “change” theme. It would be a huge headache dealing with her and Bill in the White House (and Bill is obviously always a scandal waiting to happen), but Obama could worry about that when (if) he gets there. It seemed easy to dismiss her when it seemed he could coast to election. I wonder if Obama knew back then the relatively precarious political state he’d be in now, if he would have put her near the top of his short list.

About the Author
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments