In Thailand, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that if Iran acquires a nuclear-weapons capacity, the U.S. will respond with โ€œcripplingโ€ actions and is prepared to offer allies a โ€œdefense umbrellaโ€ to prevent Iranian intimidation.

First, until now, Iran acquiring nuclear weapons has been โ€œunacceptableโ€ to both Clinton and President Obama. If thatโ€™s now โ€œinoperative,โ€ itโ€™s big โ€” and unwelcome โ€” news.

Second, would it not make sense to use โ€œcripplingโ€ actions now โ€” in an attempt to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons? For example bills sponsored by Sens. Joe Lieberman and Jon Kyl and Reps. Brad Sherman and Mark Kirk (and many others from both parties) would put serious pressure on Iranโ€™s rulers by cutting off their gasoline supplies.

Third: How can we offer a โ€œdefense umbrellaโ€ to allies against a rain of nuclear-tipped missiles at time when Congress appears to be slashing missile-defense funding and development?