I donโ€™t have the opportunity to talk much with anti-war people from the Left. Nearly all of the anti-war people I know are on the Right. Listening to some of them, particularly those who defend the United Nations (perhaps for the first time in their lives), I get the feeling that they are like the doves columnist Matthew Parris (himself a dove) describes here:

Like the admiral who gave 12 reasons for not firing a salute, the twelfth of which was that he had no powder, a certain kind of doveish commentatorโ€™s position can be summed-up thus: โ€œIโ€™m against war because Iโ€™m not convinced Iraq is harbouring weapons of mass destruction, but even if they are Iโ€™m against war because the UN has not authorised it, but if they do Iโ€™m against war because an invasion would prove a military fiasco, but even if it didnโ€™t Iโ€™m against war because toppling Saddam would destabilise Iraq, but even if it didnโ€™t Iโ€™m against war because it will antagonise moderate Arab opinion.โ€ This will not do. It is not honest.

In this Times of London essay, Parris suggests several things anti-war people should do to keep themselves honest.