If you missed Daniel Ikensonโs piece from yesterday on trade in Indiana and North Carolina, itโs worth the read โ even if he does use the word โIndianans.โ (Itโs โHoosiers,โ and no, I donโt know what it means, no living person does.) The point is that Obama and Clinton are bashing the idea of free trade in states where NAFTA and international trade in general are currently providing a huge net benefit for the economy.
Of Indiana, whose GDP is 30 percent manufacturing:
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, Indianaโs producers shipped $26 billion worth of goods to foreign customers in 2007 โ 14 percent more than the year before, and 80 percent more than in 2001. In fact, since 2001, the stateโs exports have grown at a rate one-third faster than U.S. exports overallโฆExports from Indiana to China increased by a whopping 36 percent between 2006 and 2007 โ twice the rate of total U.S. export growth to China, and nearly four times Indianaโs exports to China in 2001โฆLikewise, Indianaโs exports to Canada and Mexico have grownโฆ67 percent from 2001, eclipsing overall U.S. export growth to the NAFTA countries in both periodsโฆOf 32 broad industry groupings, 28 in Indiana experienced export growth between 2006 and 2007, and 30 experienced growth between 2001 and 2007. Of the 28 industries showing export growth between 2006 and 2007, 23 experienced double- or triple-digit percentage growth.
And North Carolina:
In North Carolina, producers shipped $23 billion worth of goods to foreign customers in 2007 โ 10 percent more than the year before, and 59 percent more than five years agoโฆNorth Carolinaโs exports to NAFTA have grown 46 percent over the past five years โ to $7.4 billionโฆ
It is important to point out that free trade has real benefits for Americans and doesnโt deserve to be anyoneโs political pin-cushion. This idea that Clinton and Obama discuss, of re-negotiating all of our trade pacts, would be extremely damaging to workers in those states and many others as well.





Comments