I’ve gotten lots of nice email on last week’s column. but a few have slipped in like this one. The facts and logic are so compelling:

Mr. Goldberg:
Like most of your columns, you are missing the obvious. Ramzi Mohammed did
have rights, because the British people and British government accorded him
those rights and didn’t suspend their laws like we have.
I take it that you don’t believe in rights of any kind for accused
terrorists, because accused terrorists are the same as actual terrorists.
Therefore, you must have applauded when the British police shot the
Brazilian noncombatant.
Your moral vacuity is astounding.