The Corner

If Truth Becomes the Enemy of Peace, There Will Be No Peace

Share this story

Cars are damaged at the site of the Russian missile strike, amid Russia’s attack on Ukraine, in Sumy, Ukraine, April 13, 2025.

Sofiia Gatilova/Reuters

When the United States made itself the only member of the G-7 club of industrialized nations to oppose and, ultimately, derail a resolution condemning Russia for its bloody Palm Sunday strike on Ukrainian civilians in Sumy, the administration insisted it had a good reason.

Acknowledging the two ballistic missiles that killed 35, including children, and wounded 117 other civilians — just one of the countless Russian guided-missile strikes on civilian targets inside Ukraine seemingly designed to produce the maximum amount of death and destruction — might undermine peace talks. “President Donald Trump’s administration told allies it couldn’t sign the statement denouncing the attack as it is ‘working to preserve the space to negotiate peace,’” Bloomberg reported. Accepting the evidence of our own eyes would not advance U.S. interests.

Noah Rothman

About the Author

Noah Rothman

Noah Rothman is a senior writer at National Review. His third book, Blood and Progress: A Century of Left-Wing Violence, was published by Hachette in May 2026.

Comments

Advertisement

Advertisement