I mentioned this on the radio this morning. Itโ€™s powerful stuff, from ABC this morning, via Mike Allen:

Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), author of anti-abortion language in the House health-care bill, tells ABCโ€™s George Stephanopoulos on โ€œGood Morning Americaโ€ that heโ€™s willing to bring down the final bill if abortion language isnโ€™t changed: โ€œ[T]he bill that they are using as a vehicle is the Senate bill. If you go to page 2069 through page 2078, you would find in there the federal government would directly subsidize abortions, plus every enrollee in the Office of Personnel management plan, every enrollee has to pay a minimum of $1 per month toward reproductive rights which includes abortion. . . . [W]eโ€™re not going to vote for this bill with that kind of language in there.โ€ . . .
STEPHANOPOULOS: โ€œLet me be clear here. If the president doesnโ€™t change the language, if your language is not accepted, you and your 11 colleagues who voted yes the last time will vote no this time. Does that mean youโ€™re prepared to take responsibility for bringing down this whole bill?โ€
STUPAK: โ€œYes, weโ€™re prepared to take responsibility. I mean, Iโ€™ve been catching it ever since last fall. Letโ€™s face it, I want to see health care. But weโ€™re not going to bypass some principles and beliefs that we feel strongly about.โ€

Yes, Bart Stupak will vote for Obamacare if abortion is nixed. But considering the White House and co. is lying about abortion in the legislation at the moment, they donโ€™t seem to be positioning to give in to Stupak.

UPDATE: Here is video of Stupak appearing on Fox News, calling the legislative process on Obamacare โ€œtaintedโ€ and predicting that the Senate bill โ€œwonโ€™t even come closeโ€ to passing in the House unchanged.