Why do I let myself in for these things? VAST right-wing e-mail bag on this. Samples:
—-”You’ve expressed your reservations with Attorney General Ashcroft and
the USA Patriot Act. Under the terms of the new Act, would it be legal for
President Bush to get possession of the confidential FBI files of his
political enemies, or is that just as illegal now as it was before?”
—-”Why did the Rose Law Firm’s billing records show up in your private
area of the White House 2 years after they were subpoenaed?”
—-”As a lawyer, how important do you think it is for person’s appearing
before a court to honor their oath to tell the truth?”
—-”Do you think your husband did any permanent damage to our judicial
system by lying under oath?”
—-”Why did you vote against the Senate Medicare Prescription Drug benefit
compromise?”
—-Ask her to list her qualifications as an executive, not a legislature
but a buck-stops-here executive.
—-”Why did you choose to run for Senator in New York State instead of
either your home state of Illinois or your adopted state of Arkansas?”
[She’s probably been asked and answered that question, and deflected it
somehow with some sort of fluff, but a real interviewer would probably come
back with a good hard follow-up like, “Isn’t it really because you didn’t
have a prayer of winning in either state, and New York is famous for
electing non-resident liberals like yourself?”]
—-”Senator Clinton, some say you showed a remarkable degree of credulity
regarding the President’s early denials in his highest profile scandals.
The account in your book seemed to reinforce rather than dispel this
perception. Can you reassure us that you aren’t especially prone to being
misled in other situations?”
—-”Do you think that federal law should legally recognize the notion of
race?”
—-The problem with Hilary isn’t the initial question, it’s the failure to
follow up. Q. “You claimed that the story about sex with an intern came
from the ‘vast right-wing conspiracy.’ Would you like to retract that?”
HRC: “It was a very difficult time for all of us.” [Or some such evasion.]
Q. (moves on) Q. [should say]. “Yes, it was difficult. But do you wish to
retract that claim, or is it still your opinion?”
—-”What do you think of school vouchers for DC?”
—-”One of the pivotal moments early in your husband’s presidency was the
vote on the proposed BTU tax. Would you support a measure to introduce that
tax now? If so, why? If not, why would it have been appropriate then and
not now?”
—-”When you were running Arkansas education, why was it so bad?”
And then there were some less-serious suggestions:
—-”Have you read ‘Living History’ yet?”
—-”When – WHEN – can we expect you and your husband go away and leave us
ALONE?”
Finally, one reader would like to recycle P.J. O’Rourke’s finely-phrased
question used in a mock-interview situation he composed regarding the
Savings and Loan crisis a few years back: “What the ****, huh? I mean,
just what the ****ing ****?”






Comments