I generally find sanctions ineffective and even counter-productive, because they have traditionally punished the people, rather than a hostile regime we are trying to hurt. I have said this often, but I am changing my mind, thanks to the work of Matt Levitt and Pat Clawson at the Washington Institute. They argue that there are specific kinds of sanctions that might have a devastating effect on the mullahs in Tehran. I think they’re right. I don’t think it’s the only way to work for regime change in Iran, but it’s one way, and they should be commended for their good work. Dontcha think?