Ramesh, you are right by definition: Imputations about personal motives are always wrong, and I withdraw it and express my regrets for it.

But, for the record, it is not the interpretation of Kagan’s first answer but of her second answer that I find so difficult to swallow. When Kagan was asked if there is a federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage, she responded, basically, “No.” Then the questions got more pointed:

“Have you ever expressed your opinion whether the federal Constitution should be read to confer a right to same-sex marriage? If so, please provide details.”
Answer: “I do not recall ever expressing an opinion on this question.”

I find it hard to see how one can conclude that Kagan has said she believes gay marriage should be left up to the political process.