Jonah: Your correspondent Matt frames the issue in a misleading way. What was objectionable about Kerryโs 1971 testimony was not that he mentioned that Americans had committed atrocities in Vietnam. Nobody disputes that. What was objectionable was Kerryโs suggestion was that these were widespread and that they amounted to an official U.S. policy. Which goes back to the larger point about Kerryโs contradictions: Kerry surrounds himself with his band of brothers at every opportunity. But on his testimony they were a band of war criminals, albeit not as culpable as the ones in Washington.
Share this story

About the Author
Ramesh Ponnuru is the editor of National Review, a columnist for the Washington Post, and a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments