Our editorial today deals with President Obama and what he calls โ€œeconomic patriotism.โ€ This put me in mind of โ€œeconomic nationalismโ€ โ€” which is a Patrick J. Buchanan cause. It was also Richard Gephardtโ€™s shtick in the 1988 Democratic primaries. (Just what you needed tonight, right? Gephardt trivia.)

โ€œEconomic patriotism,โ€ โ€œeconomic nationalismโ€? They are kissing cousins. I borrow this term from Ronald Reagan, who once used it in a letter to Gene Autry. I came across the letter when I was researching the history of the Nobel Peace Prize, and the general concept of peace. Reagan spoke of the โ€œpeaceniksโ€ of the day, or what MacArthur used to call โ€œpeace cranks.โ€ โ€œThey are kissing cousins,โ€ said the Gipper.

And donโ€™t forget the rule: If youโ€™re on the left, you can question the patriotism of anyone on the right. But the reverse is verboten. Thus, for example, can Howard Dean say, โ€œJohn Ashcroft is not a patriot,โ€ and everythingโ€™s cool.

P.S. What do Obama and his people call a Republican economic program? โ€œEconomic treasonโ€? (Tailgunner Joe, wherever he is, must be wondering why he got so much grief.)

P.P.S. I realize that what the Corner-reading masses want is, not politics, but ballet and more ballet. Happy to oblige: At The New Criterion, I have a post on a Bolshoi performance of Khachaturianโ€™s Spartacus. Go here. The Communists have long claimed Spartacus as one of their own. But he led a slave revolt โ€” and a slave revolt is the thing that Communists most fear, and work to suppress.