On reports that the Senate parliamentarian has said that the House must pass the Senate bill and the president must sign it into law before it can be changed through reconciliation:

Well, if it is so, then it’s huge news. It means that the mountain that Pelosi has been looking at has become a cliff. And this is why:
House members don’t like the Senate bill. They only want to approve it if they are guaranteed it will be amended.
But if the ruling that we heard is actually going to be . . . that means they [House Democrats] are going to have to accept the Senate bill as is, watch it signed into law, watch a . . . ceremony at the White House where the champagne is popped, backs are slapped, hats thrown in the air because [for] the first time in 100 years you have achieved universal health care — and then expect that after that, the Senate will go back and do a reconciliation which will tear the Senate apart [with an] unusual procedure, extremely divisive, in order to introduce amendments [on measures in the Senate bill] that the Senate likes and then have to strip out — in order to appease the House!
Now, if you believe all of that, you require a suspension of disbelief about [equal to] what I experienced when I watched Peter Pan [fly] at the age of seven. . . .
And there is only a single exit here. And that is if the vice president overrules the parliamentarian, which he can.
But if he does that, that’s not a nuclear option. That’s a thermonuclear option. That’s Krakatoa. That’s 100 megatons.
That will be a catastrophe if it is seen that the bill is pushed through by overruling a ruling of the neutral parliamentarian and passing what would otherwise be illegal.