The Charlotte Observer takes up the John Edwards story, reporting that Edwards needs to โ€œpublicly addressโ€ the โ€œlove childโ€ matter if he is to have a prominent role in the Democratic convention:

โ€œHe absolutely does have to (resolve it). If itโ€™s not true, he has to issue a stronger denial,โ€ said Gary Pearce, the Democratic strategist who ran Edwardsโ€™ 1998 Senate race. โ€œItโ€™s a very damaging thing. โ€ฆ The big media has tried to be responsible and handle this with kid gloves, but itโ€™s clearly getting ready to bust out. If itโ€™s not true, heโ€™s got to stand up and say, โ€˜This is not true. That is not my child and Iโ€™m going to take legal action against the people who are spreading these lies.โ€™ Itโ€™s not enough to say, โ€˜Thatโ€™s tabloid trash.โ€™โ€

The problem, the paper says, is that Edwardsโ€™ disinclination to answer questions about the matter has โ€œallowed doubts to linger and political bloggers to speculate.โ€

Two weeks ago, after the National Enquirer ran the story about the hotel liaison, he dismissed a reporterโ€™s question in Houston and used the โ€œtabloid trashโ€ line.
Edwards brushed off a Charlotte Observer reporter in Washington last week: โ€œCanโ€™t do it now, Iโ€™m sorry.โ€His designated staffer for press contacts has not responded to e-mail requests for an interview.No one answered a reporter who rang a buzzer at the gate of Edwardsโ€™ Orange County home on Wednesday. Friends and former staffers refuse to comment now, though they helped Edwards last fall by dismissing the Enquirer story of a sexual relationship between Edwards and a campaign videographer when it initially broke.โ€Sorry cannot help you on this one,โ€ wrote Jennifer Palmieri, a former top Edwards aide, in an e-mail.