Peter is absolutely right about what’s motivating the pile-on against Matt Lauer. Let me also hazard to say Lauer didn’t do such a bad job. He wouldn’t be my first or second pick for such a forum and a half-an-hour per candidate was too short, but it’s being treated as a national scandal that he wasn’t tougher on Trump. I think this 1) ignores the problems Lauer created for Trump on sexual assault in the military, on his plan or non-plan to fight ISIS, and on his criticisms of the generals; 2) reflects how a lot of journalists believe it is their role to try to drum Trump from the public stage; 3) speaks to a frustration with how Trump can get away with knowing so little–but he’s been getting away with that for a long time, in all sorts of forums, with all sorts of different interviewers.
Share this story

About the Author
Rich Lowry is the editor in chief of National Review.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments