I think I missed this in February (back when there was a Republican primary wrapping upโ€ฆremember that?):

At the Museum of Sex in New York City, artificial-intelligence researcher David Levy projected a mock image on a screen of a smiling bride in a wedding dress holding hands with a short robot groom. โ€œWhy not marry a robot? Look at this happy couple,โ€ he said to a chuckling crowd. When Levy was then asked whether anyone who would want to marry a robot was deluded, his face grew serious. โ€œIf the alternative is that you are lonely and sad and miserable, is it not better to find a robot that claims to love you and acts like it loves you?โ€ Levy responded. โ€œDoes it really matter, if youโ€™re a happier person?โ€ In his 2007 book, Love and Sex with Robots, Levy contends that sex, love and even marriage between humans and robots are coming soon and, perhaps, are even desirable. โ€œI know some people think the idea is totally outlandish,โ€ he says. โ€œBut I am totally convinced itโ€™s inevitable.โ€

(Subject line courtesy of Howard Jones)

UPDATE: An e-mail:

Laura Ingraham had Mr. Levy on her show. It was an โ€œinterestingโ€ interview. When he talks of โ€œcoming soonโ€ I think heโ€™s referring to approx 50 years. Of course, I do think the concept is twisted, but he does seem sincere, and seems to care about the lonely folk out there (he himself is married โ€“ and BTW he thinks that sex with a robot should not be considered โ€œcheatingโ€ on the marriage). Listening to him, you can hear how โ€œwell-meaningโ€ liberals could allow all this to happen.