The Corner

Immigration

More Proof That Title 42 Was a Stand-In for Border Policy

Migrants expelled from the U.S. and sent back to Mexico under Title 42 walk toward Mexico at the Paso del Norte International Bridge, in this picture taken from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, September 9, 2021. (Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters)

Today, after a federal judge overturned the mask mandate for air travel, Jen Psaki called the ruling a “disappointing decision” and said “the CDC continues recommending wearing a mask on public transit.”

But some issues, such as immigration, are seemingly immune to the Covid-regulation craze. With the ACLU and other border activists breathing down Biden’s neck, the White House has decided to terminate Title 42 — a Covid-related limit on immigration — in late May.

Time and time again, the Biden administration has said that Title 42 is not border-control policy, sticking by its open-border narrative. When the rule’s termination was announced, CDC director Rochelle Walensky wrote that there is “no longer a public health justification for [Title 42].” Homeland Security secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said Title 42 is “not an immigration authority, but rather a public health authority.”

But the narrative is just a narrative. The truth has always been that the Biden administration used Title 42 as a crutch amid a worsening crisis at the border. Officials shamefully hid behind the Covid-mitigation narrative to minimize criticism and justify some border-control policy.

Democrats such as Psaki are perfectly happy cleaving to Covid-related controls. That is, until an even bigger progressive “cause” comes into question.

Exit mobile version