Yep, just been reading the womanโ€™s deposition in the Bill Oโ€™Reilly case.

There is all sorts of fishy stuff here. Her lawyer, Benedict Morelli, is

said to be a big Dem donor โ€” but then, what trial lawyer isnโ€™t?

Result-wise, I suppose the whole thing rests on whether she has tapes. If

she has, itโ€™s bad for Bill. If she hasnโ€™t, I think a fair assumption โ€“

given what a hate figure Oโ€™Reilly is to the foam-flecked Leftโ€“is that

itโ€™s all a shakedown.

The thing that strikes me most forcefully, though, is what a silly racket

this whole โ€œsexual harassmentโ€ business is. The deposition claims that:

โ€œPlaintiff sustained conscious pain and suffering, physical injury, great

mental distress, shock, fright, and humiliation.โ€ โ€œPhysical

injuryโ€? For goodnessโ€™ sake! Even if everything in this deposition were true, I canโ€™t see why it would rise to the level of a tort. It would just โ€” and I

repeat, this is EVEN IF it were all true โ€” be a guy behaving obnoxiously.

When did women cease to be able to deal with that? The very few times Iโ€™ve

been obnoxious to women, they gave as good as they got, and then some. But

then, my pockets are barely an inch deep.

I must say, though, after reading this deposition, I shall never feel quite

the same way about falafelโ€ฆ