The problem is less opening an interest section — sensible, if nothing else for the intelligence operations it enables — than Bill Burns’ involvement in the negotiations. Condoleezza Rice laid out clear red lines in May 2006. We have reversed ourselves. Some may see pragmatism; the Iranians will see that we have no credibility. This will make matters worse. The other irony I find in the position of those who say we should have no preconditions; i.e., we should talk while Iran enriches uranium is that this, in effect, means Washington unilaterally voids three Security Council resolutions by showing Iran we are willing to negotiate its adherence to and blur the meaning of these resolutions.
Share this story

About the Author
Michael Rubin is Director of Policy Analysis at the Middle East Forum and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Advertisement
Advertisement





Comments