Have we ever had a more fascinating discussion here on the The Corner than the one about enhanced rescission authority? I think not. And so, dear reader, I share with you a Texas Law Review article entitled “A Textualist Defense of Article I, Section 7, Clause 3: Why Hollingsworth v. Viriginia was Rightly Decided, and Why INS v. Chadha was Wrongly Reasoned.” Read it online here. The author, Seth Barrett Tillman, mailed me a copy. He also enclosed a note from Forrest McDonald, who calls the article “historically absolutely convincing”–high praise from one of our great constitutional scholars.

Okay, that ought to get The Corner a-buzzin’ today.